NASA’s “Smoking Gun” Of Climate Fraud
NASA have cooled the past so as to create a fake modern warming trend that correlates almost-perfectly with rising atmospheric CO2 levels. Below is the PROOF (research courtesy of Tony Heller).
Back in 1974, at the height of the global cooling concerns, the National Center For Atmospheric Research (NCAR) generated this graph of Earth’s average temperature change:
Clearly visible in the graph is, 1) the large spike in temps during the 1940’s, 2) the subsequent rapid cooling to 1970, and 3) the overall cooling from 1900 to 1970.
In 1975, the National Academy of Sciences published a very similar graph for Northern hemisphere temperatures which supports the three conclusions of the NCAR graph:
However, by 1981 the graph had started to tilt to the left:
The temperature in 1970 was suddenly now 0.1C warmer than in 1900.
Unsurprisingly, this change coincided with NASA “Climate Prophet” James Hansen’s interest in demonstrating a CO2-driven warming trend:
NASA had just committed climate fraud, and they got away with it.
Spurred-on by the complete lack of scrutiny, NASA, saddled with the task of proving the politicized global warming theory, brazenly continued cooling the past so as to exaggerate their already exaggerated warming trend.
Serving as an example of this, the next graph shows how their 1880-2000 global warming trend has been overstated again (doubled, in fact) since 2001–again, simply by cooling the past:
NASA obtains its global temperature data from NOAA’s GHCN (Global Historical Climatology Network), but data is missing for about half of the Earth’s surface, including most of Africa, Antarctica, and Greenland.
That missing data is filled-in with computer modeled readings, meaning that 50% of the global temperature data used by NOAA and NASA is fake.
Furthermore, the only places with what could be considered good coverage are North America and Western Europe — and, rather tellingly, it is these areas starting to show a GSM-induced cooling trend.
Since 2016, and according to NOAA’s own data, North America has cooled at a rate of 0.93C per decade.
This is a sizable drop, and one more than 13 times the ‘official’ average rate of increase since 1880: “The global annual temperature has increased at an avg. rate of 0.07C (0.13F) per decade since 1880” — NOAA’s Jan 2020 report.
And here is the smoking gun of NASA/NOAA climate fraud…
The global “adjustments” being made correlate nigh-on perfectly with the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide levels. In other words, the data are being manipulated in order to prove their greenhouse gas global warming theory:
This isn’t science, this is a criminal act, the biggest scam in the history of mankind.
Moreover, this evil is compounded by the fact that the exact opposite climatic reality is looming. The COLD TIMES are returning, which, unlike fruitful times of warmth, have ALWAYS delivered untold suffering to humanity via crop losses, famine, and the collapse of empires.
Earth’s climate is cyclic, never linear — the COLD TIMES are returning as decided by the Sun.
This article was originally posted Aug 9, 2020 on the now censored electroverse.net.
Great Analysis Cap!!!
Yes, even Clif High predicted a “Brutal Winter” coming this year!!!
He is well known for his 9/11 prediction, which no one else besides
the perpetrators had any idea.
Dallas
Clif High is a know scam artist and fraud https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@geneeverett/cliff-high-the-scam-artist
https://steemit.com/cryptocurrency/@etcmike/clif-high-webbot-cryptocurrencies-versus-bankers
Thanks, Diamond. Clif IS High blathers on and on about space aliens without providing one shred of evidence as well.
So NASA lies about the climate. I wonder what else they’ve lied about? Something regarding the moon, perhaps?
Stop.
I watched the Astronauts land on the Moon thru MY telescope…so just STOP!
No telescope on Earth can do that.
Where is Buzz Aldrin when you need him?
The FBI is a power hungry organization of renegades
And they knew.
Example they deliberately caused the destruction of the World Trade Center & the pentagon. Killing military and civilian personal.
There were warnings on national news coming from France & the Philippines. The perpetrators of the long ago fertilizer bomb attack on the World Trade Center were caught by Philippine authorities, not the FBI, with plans on their laptop to destroy buildings in the USA using aircraft. This story was on national news. French commandos took down jihadist on a hijacked plane in France. They warned the United States that their intentions were to use the aircraft to attack & destroy the Eiffel Tower. That was also on network news.
Then there was a cover story spread that a person bright enough to fly a plan would not engage in a suicide attack. Well in 1999 a plane leaving the northeast United States was deliberately flown into the ocean killing all onboard, with the co-pilot screaming Allah Akbar. That was also on national news. Congress instead of investigating and nipping this evil momentum in the bud granted them (the FBI) extraordinary new surveillance powers and created the monster we have today.
, ‘Hard Sun was a BBC drama that was taken off the shelves….https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KY1pFa-8tE0……
Robert frost ..Fire and Ice
Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice.
See the article “Is Climate Engineering Real” for an insight of what ‘they’ are doing and totally ignoring the Sun’s cyclical impact. ‘They’ are using ‘geoengineering’ to change the weather and either ignoring the devastating results or purposely and knowingly wanting those results. The article also covers chemtrail contents and their very negative results to the earth and humanity.
At least NOAA are honest about the Earth’s temperature dropping since 2016:
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/land_ocean/12/6/2016-2023?trend=true&trend_base=10&begtrendyear=2016&endtrendyear=2023
https://climate.nasa.gov/
You may have to click on the temp which says 1.1 C on it.
Now when you go to the graph 2016 and 2020 are both 1.02
while 2022 is 0.90 C and three other years in the interval do go above 0.93.
I’d say a tenth of a degree drop is cooling in these measurements.
It almost seems ridiculous to be making a fuss about temps this close
as go outside with your infrared gun and the temps vary as wildly as
a West Texas thermometer!!!
Dallas
Please compare NOAA temps with NASA temps,
their trend doesn’t agree.
NASA is dropping, from 0.93 to 0.90 while NOAA’s temps
are graphed as increasing the last three years.
Conflicting data needs investigations.
Dallas
Wow Cap you dragged these ones out of the woodwork with these comments, folks forget the theories of man made climate control, ultimately the Sun 98.9 percent of the mass of the solar system and the planets, control the events that change the climate on this planet. Nothing else…..the rest you all sprout about is just down to greed and human nature, and given the opportunity and the power and and the carrot on the string in front of you, mostly money but mostly control , control of others, we would more than likely all follow the same track,
And history has shown this to be the case time and time again, just the latest examples, are the way people turned on one other during the Covid hype, where people that did not partake in the collectives ideals and get injected, were turned upon, physical violence, or reported to the authorities, has happened in the mid to late 1930’s Europe as a major example, but the same is happening now over climate warming, sadly the collective have been preconditioned for this latest world wide Psychosis and most accept it with out question, sadly for the people that do question the now enshrined belief system, is the people with the bigger juicier carrot dangling off the string in front of them, so they will do everything possible to mute the voice of the people that question them, bills before parliament in Australia to exactly that, to call people that question them liars and label them as some how against the greater good of the collective, and they must be silenced at all cost, punishment will be dispensed by those in the collective, as happened during Covid.
A major X1000 to X4000 class flare directly at earth, is the only thing I can see that will change this, taking all comms down, no internet, no people walking around the streets oblivious to the world around them, time to look up!!
Only a matter of time
Sorry for the long dribble
Feel better now
Have a great weekend all
Peter
: the Sun 98.9 percent of the mass of the solar system and the planets, control the events that change the climate on this planet.”
None of the change in climate in the past 50 years could have been caused by changes of energy from the sun measured at the top of the atmosphere by NASA satellites, which show a slight decline since the 1970s. Guess again.
Richard Green.
“None of the change in climate in the past 50 years could have been caused by changes of energy from the sun measured at the top of the atmosphere by NASA satellites, which show a slight decline since the 1970s. Guess again.”
Mofflingtonhead
At perihelion on or about 2nd-4th January planet earth is more than 4 million kilometers closer to the sun than it is at aphelion, six months later. This causes change of incoming solar energy at the top of atmosphere in excess of 4%. This extra energy at the peak of Southern summer warms the tropical and Southern Ocean, some of which energy the ocean stores and disperses globally.
The extreme of the Milankovitch Eccentricity Cycle is estimated to have an incoming solar energy differential of around 21% between perihelion and aphelion.
Of course, the solar wind is also solar energy, I refer you to the Svensmark hypothesis and the effect of cloud cover on global average temperatures.
Half truths are often equal to half deceptions.
I was talking about year to year changes in the average temperature, overa 50 year period, NOT seasonal variations within a single year.
I was also talking about the last 50 years, which is irrelevant to planetary geometry changes of solar energy.
You have failed to refute my claim.
Your comments are deflections.
The geological record refutes your claim. Cumulative effect is often overlooked.
Richard,
You are absolutely right!!!
Now what NASA doesn’t count are the heating effects of the
Global Electric Currents such as the juice that lights up the auroras.
Calculate the wattage used by a flourescent bulb to get one figure multiplied by the area of the auroras. Then figure possibly a better comparison the incandescent bulb which heats up considerably.
These currents flowing through the atmosphere can account for
ALL the global warming attributed to the CO2 by the warmists.
The TSI (Total Solar Irradiance is the one I believe you are referring to which hasn’t changed that much, correct?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_irradiance
Dallas
In case of a multi-day global blackout (by a space super-storm, or volcanic super-eruption or asteroid explosion), the chaos will lead to the explosion of all 1000 nuclear reactors, and bunkers are useless.
How about discussing the extinction prevention, with preparedness drills of the 30 EXISTING super-lasers, whose laser beams, when colliding up high, they will produce huge plasma balls to repel asteroids/space storms and the cosmic rays that provenly stimulate magma (Ebisuzaki, 2011)?
Cambridge, after the Tonga eruption last year (that is still worsening storms), asked for magma de-stimulation.
The warming trend on the UAH data set is 0.13 Celsius per decade. If we assume temperature anomalies in 1979 (when satellites first started measuring the atmosphere) was roughly the same as 1970 this means that current global temperatures are the same as the 1940’s peak, allowing for the possibility of there being a difference between the surface temperature and the atmosphere and a small margin of error in the data sets.
While this subject is several decades old, it does not get reported often. In my 25 years of climate science reading, this was the best article on the subject of the disappearing global cooling from 1940 to 1975.
Satellites started measuring temperatures globally in 1974 and show a downward trend, in line with the alarmist projections of the time. Temperatures bottomed in 1979, that is why the current crop of grant applicants prefer to use it as a starting point.
Hey Richard, you really need to do some research into the subject before making comment, there are hundreds of papers a year released each year on the effects of radiation from the sun and cosmic radiation, with direct effects on the planet from changes in climate/ weather, earth quakes and volcanos, there has been multi nation efforts in launching satellites to generate more data, that shows, the science is correct, we are finally discovering how everything interacts, globally through the solar system and interplanetary and then you sprout the same predictable lines. But we are talking all the frequencies of energy generated by the sun, returned by the planets, even the effect of our own moon with radiation
this science of space weather is evolving so rapidly, you need to research the findings
Most climate papers are claptrap
If the top of the atmosphere solar energy MEASUREMENTs barely changed in the past 50 years, then the sun’s energy did not cause the 1975 to 2014 global warming.
Changes in air pollution and cloudiness has caused more sun to reach Earth’s surface, but that is another subject.
Writing a paper does not create truth.
Research Solar inertial motion.
So Richard.
I did not mention climate papers. nor did i mention global warming.
Stop thinking of the energy from the sun as purely a source of visible wavelength. Have a look at the longer and shorter wavelengths, then there is the solar winds, the charged particles and dust, hitting Magnetosphere, ionosphere and down through the various layers of atmosphere. these winds travel at times in excess of 1500km/s, around 5.4Million Kilometers an hour.
To say there is no influence on our planet in any way, is ignorant, you may as well say the earth is flat….
Do your self a favor, turn the TV off, and go and read some papers on space weather and the electromagnetic effects of the sun and cosmic radiation on our planet..
There would not be multinational efforts to launch so many satellites to investigate and monitor the effects on the planet from space if those papers did not have any scientific merit.
Oh the cloud formation, Yes that is down to electromagnetic forcing.
same as volcano and earthquakes.
Then I get on the Schumann Resonance frequencies. affected by the sun and cosmic radiation.
I find it rather strange that our brainwave and Heart generate frequencies close to the Schumann Resonance frequencies, I also find it strange that the Frequencies generated by earth quakes also are around these same frequencies.
also animals use these frequencies for communications and navigation.
Along with the military.
It starts to get very interesting, Well I am very interested, I have built magnetometers, seismograph/seisometers, ELF/VLF receivers, Infra sound sensors. just to pursue an interest…
Hi Peter and readers. I really appreciate your informative comment, Peter, and if you could provide the occasional reference to well written and balanced scientific literature on these topics that would be a valuable contribution.
A comment reference on a Friday would give us a timely opportunity to digest and indigest the interpretations by scientists of the universe around us.
Best regards.
We built outdoor, unheated swimming pools in England in the 1930s called Lidos….any volunteers with present temps…..
FYI Tony Heller also plotted adjustments against CO2 and found that BELOW 380ppm NOAA pushed readings DOWN but ABOVE 380ppm they pushed them UP – in proportion to the amount of CO2! https://twitter.com/Great_Briton_I/status/1683244853780463617