New Study Links Supernovae, Cosmic Rays, Climate Change, And Evolutionary Leaps
A new study proposes that major biodiversity changes are linked to supernovae—the explosions of massive stars, suggesting that cosmic processes and astrophysical events influence the evolution of life on Earth.
A team of scientists at DTU Space (Denmark’s space research institute) say they have found a strong correlation between changes in the diversity of marine life in the past half a billion years and the occurrence of local supernova explosions.
According to Henrik Svensmark, one author of the study, it is possible that supernova bring about violent changes in Earth’s climate.
“A high number of supernovae leads to a cold climate with a large temperature difference between the equator and polar regions,” said Svensmark. “This results in stronger winds, ocean mixing, and transportation of life-essential nutrients to the surface waters along the continental shelves.”
The team’s paper states, “In accordance with the cosmic ray theory, Earth experienced cold glacial periods when the local supernova frequency was high … high cosmic rays and warm climates when the flux was low. These results suggest that changes in supernovae frequency and, thereby, changes in cosmic rays have significantly influenced the Phanerozoic climate.”
The paper goes on to suggest a correlation between past supernova rates and the burial of organic matter in ocean sediments during the last 500 million years. The sequence goes like this: supernovae rates influence climate; climate influences atmosphere–ocean circulation; that circulation brings nutrients to marine organisms; nutrient concentrations control bioproductivity (how organisms thrive); then, as they die, their remains settle into sea sediments, which fossilize and preserve the record of past biological activity.
All of this appears to correlate with changes in supernova rates — supernovae look to influence climate and the energy available to biological systems.
Svensmark’s team studied the fossil record of ancient shallow marine areas. These were along the edges of oceans and other bodies of water in the Phanerozoic period of Earth’s geologic history–the period of time we’re in now–which began some 542 million years ago. On studying the rates of change in species of life they found clear evidence of explosions in biodiversity–which, to some degree, recalls the work of Robert Felix, namely ‘Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps’ (worth a read).
Next, the team looked at the astrophysical fossil record of supernovae. They studied supernova frequencies recorded in three data sets of open stellar clusters. Those catalogs contain data about clusters within 850 parsecs of the Sun, with ages 520 million years and younger. The team then correlated the data with each other and linked higher-than-normal rates of past supernova explosions with climate-influenced changes in biodiversity in shallow marine environments here on Earth.
The Mechanics
The chain of events that leads from star death to biodiversity changes on Earth begins with a massive progenitor star reaching the end of its life and collapsing in on itself. The infalling material rebounds off the stellar core and rushes out into to space.
That cloud of debris scatters all the elements made by the star both before and during the supernova explosion. The event also emits vast amounts of cosmic rays. Those energetic particles eventually arrive in our Solar System. Some smash into Earth’s atmosphere and send showers of ions crashing through our protective layers. In line with the CR theory, these assist in the creation of aerosols that in turn form clouds (more cosmic rays = more clouds = global cooling).
Clouds regulate solar energy, controlling how much sunlight reaches Earth’s surface. The warmth of the sunlight is one part of the water-warmth-nutrient triad that enables life to form and thrive on the planet. The influence of supernovae is part of the cycle of substantial climate shifts, thanks to the intensity of cosmic rays.
According to Svensmark, those changes can be as much as several hundred percent over millions of years: “The new evidence points to a connection between life on Earth and supernovae, mediated by the effect of cosmic rays on clouds and climate”, he said.
From 2017
https://notrickszone.com/2017/10/19/ph-d-thermal-engineer-claims-supernova-theory-explains-global-warming-extinction-events-ice-ages/#sthash.glDFWekE.dpbs
Quoted paper:
http://www.davidpublisher.com/Public/uploads/Contribute/59a8d12012dc2.pdf
I knew that I read this somewhere else. They even used the same photo.
https://www.universetoday.com/160686/did-supernovae-help-push-life-to-become-more-diverse/amp/
Not only is ‘Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps” by the late Robrt W Felix worth a read but so is his earlier work “Ice Age Now”.
Oops, the earlier book by Felix is NOT BY FIRE BUT BY ICE.
This is a wild theory.
To the extent that I know anything (not a lot), I’m sticking with solar cycles & volcanic activity as climate cycle drivers.
I miss Robert and his contributions. He went so suddenly!
When talking about climate cycle drivers it all depends on what time scale you’re talking about. Solar cycles and volcanos plus ocean oscillations result in climate change on the scale of a human life. Milankovitch cycles swing the Earth between glacial periods (an ice age in everyday language) and interglacials such as we’re currently in in time periods of tens or hundreds of thousands of years. Galactic cycles affect the climate on a time scale of millions of tens of millions of years.
I loved Felix’s website. Unfortunately he had an autoimmune disease and was vaxxed and subsequently went into a death spiral as he indicated in his last few posts.
Homosapiens are responsible all past, present and future warming. Come on get with the program folks. Dear Leader says it is existential crisis so it must be so.
English [en], pdf, 38.2MB, Robert W Felix – Not by Fire but by Ice (pdf).pdf
Not by fire but by ice: discover what killed the dinosaurs … and why it could soon kill us
Sugarhouse, 2. ed, 2005
Felix, Robert W
https://annas-archive.org/md5/2f2cd043ace7f48e6dba783269c7fcc5
Great to see you writing about the effects of nova events, Cap, just need to point out that the Earth’s effects are NOT from super novae, it is, instead, what is being called a micro novae, that happens every 12,000 years. A super novae would take the Earth out completely, but the “micro” version does not. Right?
CRs about the same now as ’15: https://cosmicrays.oulu.fi/
Record El Nino that year into top temp on UAH chart:
https://ggweather.com/enso/oni1990.png
TCI is higher now than ’15. Kp7 today from coronal hole, CRs dropped.
https://www.spaceweather.com/
Dr. Svensmark hypothesized some years back that during solar minimums, cloudiness on Earth would increase because cosmic radiation entering the atmosphere would create an aeriosol at high altitudes, and the aerosols/cloudiness would have a cooling effect due to reflection of radiant solar energy. He further hypothesized that during solar maximums, the radiant solar energy that is the source of the force behind the solar wind would deflect a substantial part of the cosmic radiation that would otherwise have struck the earth during the maximum portion of the solar cycle. Although Dr. Svensmark was unable to secure funding for researching his hypothesis from the usual sources for the usual reasons, he eventially secured a grant from a brewing company (Belgian company if I recall correctly), and he eventually published a research report demonstrating that in fact cosmic rays entering the Earth’s upper atmosphere did generate an aerosol as he had predicted. And of course his current hypothesis regarding the supernovae fits in nicely with his previous work.
Of course the speculation regarding evolutionary leaps is nonsensical. If one seriously studies even a simple living organism, let alone the complexity of human physiology, one should note that systems and processe don’t function at all unless every part of the system is present and function in coordination with the rest of the parts. Random mutation provides no explanation for the existence of living organisms on Earth. For the explanation, see Genesis, Chapter 1–recalling that the Genesis account is explaining who and why, not how and when. 🙂
P.S. Please forgive what are likely many typos, etc., in the above text, but the time is late, and I don’t have enough focus remaining to edit it any further.
the woman saw that the tree was good for food, that it was [a]pleasant to the eyes, and a tree desirable to make one wise, she took of its fruit and ate
The essence of the scientific process. To bad that so much of what gets published in the journals/religion are attempts to hide the tree and it’s fruit.
A rabbi told of the following interpretation: Eve decided, by eating the fruit, that human beings should not remain cute pets of God, but independent beings with free will. For this it was necessary and unavoidable to violate God’s commandment at least once. — And God had arranged it with his commandment not to eat from the tree of the knowledge of the good and evil, as required. Thus, Eve became the mother of humankind.
Latest science: A Nova event, even a Supernova, does not destroy a star. Astrophysics is now able to see to a greater level of detail of novas, that shows a shell of material travelling outwards, with the originating Star remaining at the centre. Also, there are a large number of different types of nova event, including recurring and micro-nova. It is believed by some that our sun has a recurring micro-nova event every 12,500 years (approx). The heavy elements we find on our planet were believed to be due to supernova events from other stars. The problem with that hypothesis is that the half life of the heaviest elements precludes them from travelling such distances to us and have the properties they exhibit. The current hypothesis is that our sun produces these elements during its micro-nova event, which fits the observed evidence. Another hypothesis is that this micro-nova event and magnetic pole shifting are linked. Currently, our magnetic poles have stopped wandering and are accelerating away from what we call the North and South poles. We live in interesting times…
Seems the clam was the first evolutionary step into the two part control problem.
That is, either side of the clam could open or close the clam, deciding what was for dinner that night.
Coming up the evolutionary chain, we now have the left brain – right brain control of the human body. Which side is going to do it, to decide what’s to eat tonight?
Is is the logical side, buy the hamberger, not the steak as it’s cheaper?
Or will it be the emotional side, the salad looks lovely tonight honey?
This control problem then runs into men/women, or republican/democrat!
One as a Spiritual must rise above this evolutionary situation, controlling both sides of the body.
Even my car battery has two poles, so the two terminal problem must be built into the fabric of the universe, not just the biological.
It does seem life as biological units are eating up the physical universe, which I consider a good thing!!!
How does this seem to you ?
Frequencies in electromagnetic systems are I think, part of what you’re referring to. It will be interesting to experience the change if we are alive when the earth’s pole flip. I believe much of the social unrest and political strife today can be attributed to the current changes amd weakening of earth’s magnetism. What will be on the other side will remain a mystery until then.
Kp 8 yesterday from a little negative polarity area on the Sun:
https://gong.nso.edu/data/magmap/QR/bqG/202303/mrbqG230323/mrbqG230323t1004c2269_313.gif
https://www.spaceweather.com/images2023/24mar23/coronalhole_sdo_blank.jpg
Mexi volcanos popped, feeding storms mid west:
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?tcso2,28.633,-91.274,5
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?thunder,28.633,-91.274,5
Seems like yin yang
I miss Ice Age Bob all the time. He would have loved your site, Cap. Thank you for stepping up.
This is exactly what Robert Felix(RIP) was saying over at the old Ice Age Now website.