Canada Wildfires: Data vs Hysteria
“There have already been 2,355 fires covering an incredible span of 10 million acres in Canada this year,” screams the opening lines of one recent MSM article — no context, just what appear to be high numbers and a sprinkling of hyperbole.
The latest data from the Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Centre (CIFFC) shows that as of June 6, there were 437 active fires, bringing the year’s total to 2,355, which is running about 400 fires above the 10-year average.
“Wildfires are a natural phenomenon,” continues the the MSM article; however, “climate change is making them last longer and be more intense.”
Let’s look into that claim.
Below is a chart courtesy of the National Forestry Database. It shows Canada’s annual number of forest fires and the areal extent dating back to 1990.
Study the chart. The claimed ‘climate signal’ simply isn’t there. The trend is quite clearly down.
Next, let’s look at the cause of the fires.
Taking Alberta as our example –simply because it was first on the list– ‘humanity activity’ has been the leading culprit of wildfires in the province every year since 2003–and by some margin, with lightening strikes second, and prescribed burns third.
Taking one recent year, 681 fires were caused by humans, 89 by lightning, and 2 by prescribed burns (with 28 unspecified).
“Climate change is making [wildfires] last longer and be more intense,” is the claim. However, the data suggest human recklessness is the leading cause of the fires — and even then, the trend is still down.
Adding weight to this, let’s refer back to the chart, and note the year 2020 — specifically its dramatic drop-off. That was pandemic year — you know, when Canadians were forcibly locked in their houses because of a nasty round of the flu.
Curiously, ‘global warming’ appears to have come down the sniffles that year, too, with both wildfire numbers and burn acreage hitting all-time lows.
I try to stay clear of specious conspiracy theories on this site, but help me out a bit here climate alarmists. Explain the satellite imagery showing the fires starting-up simultaneously across Canada. The footage is fake? Possibly. It’s either that, or the majority of these fires, as they are every year, were started by arsonists — only this time in perhaps a timed attack.
Seeing what I’ve seen in recent years, I consider it well within the realm of possibly for a government hellbent on increasing its carbon tax and ‘climate fighting powers’ to stage a narrative forwarding spectacle such as this.
And, in turn, their dutiful MSM lapdogs are on overdrive right now:
Another curiosity, Canada’s fires seem very patriotic, adhering, for the most part, to the north side of the U.S. border:
The fires’ patriotism is of course a great relief for Americans, who can thank their lucky stars that they aren’t enduring another year like 1937 when a forest fire broke-out every three minutes:
Weather-fixated television news would make us all think that disasters are all getting worse.
They’re not — the data are clear on that, too.
In 1900, around 4.5% of the land area of the world would burn every year. Over the last century, this declined to about 3.2%. And in the last two decades, satellites show an even further decline. In 2021 just 2.5% burned.
Below is the ‘official’ wildfires chart for the United States:
It, as we also note in Canada, shows a declining trend.
But there’s more to the story.
The Biden administration recently scrubbed all wildfire data prior to 1983. This was done because fire burn acreage was found to be much higher between 1910-1960 than it is today and therefore contradicted the desired AGW/wildfire correlation.
In typically Orwellian fashion, the administration wiped these decades of inconvenient data from the history books citing the lackluster reasoning: “it wasn’t official” (linked here).
Moreover, the year 1983 –the new starting point– just so happens to have the lowest burn acreage in recorded history:
The picture is clear, there is no –that’s zero, zip– correlation between fire intensity and/or frequency and ‘climate change’.
Anyone claiming otherwise is spreading unscientific propaganda.
U.S. burn acreage is actually down 90% since CO2 was at pre-industrial levels.
Tellingly, the Biden administration recently deleted this document, too:
Further reading:
Wildfires in Europe are also trending down (scroll to third story in the article linked below):
Please explain the high sunspot count in SC25
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/solar-cycle-progression
Sunspot count is supposed to correlate with solar output. Is all of this global cooling due only to Hunga Tonga, or is solar output actually declining? Please explain what’s going on, since the sunspot count is high currently.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Hunga_Tonga%E2%80%93Hunga_Ha%CA%BBapai_eruption_and_tsunami
Combined, SC24 and SC25 are historically weak.
However, and as has always been my contention, SC26 is where the GSM party likely starts.
So the cooler weather we are having here in KY is cuz of GSM intensifying correct?
My Wife hates Me and You cuz of these facts…nah She is part lizard and loves HEAT/HOT/HOTTER/HOTTEST!
We have a wood stove(Made of steel jokers!) and have 88+ acres for wood. AND 2-300 acres for more wood available. We fine…and Thanks for all you and others do for the Climate Society.
I think Valentina Zharkova has an answer:
https://solargsm.com/interview-solar-activity-magnetic-field-and-links-to-volcanic-eruption-frequencies-by-v-zharkova-9-june-2023/
POSTCARD FROM PARADISE<
1.spanish man is a twisted firestarter, maybe close to portugal?.https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2022/12/20/spanish-man-arrested-for-causing-19-forest-fires-in-two-years/….
smoke and mirrors……
2.Solar cycle 25 may yet be one of the most strongest cycles yet if the Termination Event Theory says that solar cycle 25 might not have even started yet.We found that the longer the time between terminators, the weaker the next cycle would be," Bob Leamon, a solar scientist at the University of Maryland-Baltimore County and termination event researcher, told SpaceWeather.com. "Conversely, the shorter the time between terminators, the stronger the next solar cycle would be. you heard it from a Leamon?
Whether Solar Cycle 25 unfolds as the researchers say it will determine whether the Termination event will be taken seriously.
3.Focussing on Co2 as an argument against AGW is misleading . Obviously its kind of neither here nor there as a plant food and historic temperature indicator.Fossil fuels have brought us another kind of misery . ….see you soon
1983 also a massive snow year in the West hence the very low number of fires. What a convenient starting point. Nowhere to go but up.
https://cssl.berkeley.edu/
It was the peak of the Salekian drought and the peak of the 19 year drought cycle in southern Africa. The cycle is Metonic.
Philippines: Thousands evacuated around Mayon Volcano
“The Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology (Phivolcs) said that the volcano was “in a relatively high level of unrest” and that a “hazardous eruption is possible within weeks or even days.””
https://www.dw.com/en/philippines-thousands-evacuated-around-mayon-volcano/a-65865110
Italy’s Campi Flegrei volcano is at risk of eruption, researchers say
https://www.upi.com/Science_News/2023/06/09/italy-campi-flegrei-volcano-researchers-eruption/6391686325783/
This event looks to be, perhaps, not quite imminent but potentially catastrophic.
Mayon erupted last week following solar flares and formed a cat 2 typhoon which is now drenching southern Japan. An Indo volcano is also in that mix. Hawaii and Kamchatka also erupted and are still going and of course the Mexi volcano is still going and continues bringing storms to the US:
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?tcso2,28.999,-162.070,3,i:pressure
https://www.wunderground.com/hurricane/western-pacific/2023/typhoon-guchol
The question is always: ‘Why?” Why deleting documents and why scrubbing decades with high numbers of burned acreage ? What could possibly be the purpose of that?
According to the Economist today, global seas are rising 3.4 mm. per year. Please explain how this is happening if the Arctic and Antarctic ice isn’t melting. In fact , China is now building a new Great Wall to protect its cities from the sea.
The 3.4mm a year sea level rise is based on satellite data which may or may not have been tampered with, earlier satellites showed roughly 1.7mm a year only the latest ones show 3.4mm. An average of multiple tide gauges (to account for the fact that the land is rising in some places and sinking in others) also shows a rise of about 1.7mm/year, the same as the trend for the start of the 20th century. Sea levels might be increasing due to thermal expansion of water and/or the fact that billions of gallons of water a year are being pumped from deep aquifers for irrigation. This is water that has been trapped underground for thousands of years so adding it to the hydrological cycle means sea levels will rise (97% of all water on Earth is in the oceans so 97% of any any “fossil” water will end in the oceans in a matter of days or weeks). China is doing a lot of the water extraction which could well mean coastal cities are sinking by 5mm or more a year, hence the need for sea walls.
Follow the money on Economist. Who is financing them. The only truthful thing I could find on China “new wall to protect its cities: ” they are reclaiming land by pumping sand and creating a barrier to “enemy ships. Be careful what you read. Examine the sources.
The wildfires in Canada may be partly caused by decades of mismanagement, i.e. not carrying out controlled burns to periodically remove dead wood and vegetation (brash). A large build up will lead to hotter more intense fires that are harder to put out, this has been a major problem in California and Australia in recent years along with lack of clearing of firebreaks around properties. This change of management happened as a result of pressure from environmentalists, yet again showing how clueless they are. Several years or maybe a decade’s worth of brash build up can be safely burnt off by forest managers, but once there’s a huge build up it can’t be safely burnt and physically removing it is far too costly. This could mean that the next few decades are going to see an upward trend in fire damage until most of the build up is gone and fires start to become smaller and less damaging.
Even the kings of climate alarmism, the Guardian, were printing articles on past
forest mismanagement until 2017 when Trump started talking about it, at which point they switched to blaming global warming.
I only found out today that a large wildfire in the Scottish Highlands just over a week ago may well be the biggest ever recorded in the UK in terms of area burnt. Surprisingly the MSM failed to pick up on it and blame it on AGW, especially as May was a lot warmer and drier than average but nowhere near record breaking. The fire happened in an area I know fairly well, but from the handful of pictures I could find in local news sites it’s impossible to pinpoint exactly where it was or where it started. What I do know is it was very close to a wind farm and a very high voltage transmission line that often seems to be having work done to it so it can carry yet more “green” energy hundreds of miles to where it’s actually needed. Pure coincidence or could one of these be the source of the fire, and globally how many fires are started by faulty electrical infrastructure. The fire service has blamed it on wild campers allowing a campfire to get out of control (the area is away from roads or any significant peaks that are popular with walkers so it’s likely that people very rarely wild camp there), or a discarded cigarette. If it was a cigarette, what are the chances that it was discarded by someone working on a “green” energy project? I’d say it’s pretty high.
Sounds very much like the government CAGW propaganda line being pushed here in Australia. Likewise the actual long term trend in annual total area burnt here shows a multi decade downward trend. Similarly also, in recent times overwhelmingly the majority of fires are caused by human activity.
Spot on 100%. The majority of this distruction is caused by the tree huggers restricting land managers with an endless onslaught of lawsuits. They should have never let them get a foothold with the spotted owl lawsuits back in the 80’s/90’s. They have absolutely destroyed our forests and sustainable logging.
I’m beyond analysing their BS because it’s so darn predictable.
Stormy in S Alaska today: 65mph, rain coast, mountain blizzard, 39F in Valdez:
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?rain,59.120,-151.260,5,i:pressure,m:flfa6C
Canada is on fire because it’s been record hot from solar flares during planetary alignments:
https://cms.zerohedge.com/s3/files/inline-images/24Mar-G4_alert_0404UTC.jpg?itok=fqV5qndr
https://www.solarham.net/pictures/2023/may9_2023_cme.gif
https://www.spaceweather.com/images2023/09may23/blackoutmap2.jpg
https://www.spaceweather.com/images2023/09may23/blackoutmap1.jpg
https://www.solarham.net/pictures/2023/may9_2023_m6.5.jpg
https://www.solarham.net/pictures/2023/may16_2023_m9.6.jpg
https://www.solarham.net/pictures/2023/may20_2023_m8.9.jpg