When we consider the large amounts of snowfall through much of the hemisphere it seems unlikely that there was actually less snow mass than on average. We understand that there are certainly areas that have received below average snow accumulation but the revision barely shows reaching average at only a couple of times in the year. This looks like a significant overcorrection and we know such overcorrections always go in the direction of the prevailing weather belief system.
That’s BS – that FMI revision is not realistic and is just a bunch of politics . The original chart indicating all-time record NH snowfall mass is the correct one. Don’t buy into that revision. It’s BS. I don’t know if the FMI have turned into scumbag liars as of now or not. But I think that’s what’s occurring. The FMI have become all-time liars!!
“NOAA researchers have been fomenting lies and distortions about climate…The junk science that they cranked out has been used by mainstream media and cultural elites to perpetuate a panic about the weather and climate.”
The snow mass graph from Environment Canada includes mountainous areas so shouldn’t be directly compared with the FMI graph, but they should track each other reasonably closely. However since it shows that for the past few months snow mass was above average but not as much above average as the old FMI data I’m not sure which version of the FMI is more accurate. It could be the case that they realised the old version was showing too much snow, tried to make a valid correction and got it wrong so the new version shows too little snow.
I couldn’t find archived charts on their website to see if they’ve revised previous years downwards. It’s a case of waiting until next year and seeing what they show. If they show snow mass above average this makes it more likely that their correction was justified rather than agenda driven data tampering.
The AGW narrative is failing…miserably. It is now OK to openly mock those that still push such insane and unfounded ideas. There is NO reason for anyone to believe the lies that are constantly being spewed out of the talking heads mouths. We are winning in the court of public opinion.
Unlock with Patreon
Not the first time data has been changed because it doesn’t fit the narrative!
https://youtu.be/n6VM41-v2gg?si=SR78EKKmIfbMICE2
When we consider the large amounts of snowfall through much of the hemisphere it seems unlikely that there was actually less snow mass than on average. We understand that there are certainly areas that have received below average snow accumulation but the revision barely shows reaching average at only a couple of times in the year. This looks like a significant overcorrection and we know such overcorrections always go in the direction of the prevailing weather belief system.
That’s BS – that FMI revision is not realistic and is just a bunch of politics . The original chart indicating all-time record NH snowfall mass is the correct one. Don’t buy into that revision. It’s BS. I don’t know if the FMI have turned into scumbag liars as of now or not. But I think that’s what’s occurring. The FMI have become all-time liars!!
ARTICLE: Here’s some good news!
Junk science at NOAA about to come to an end
By Bill Ponton
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/04/junk_science_at_noaa_about_to_come_to_an_end.html
“NOAA researchers have been fomenting lies and distortions about climate…The junk science that they cranked out has been used by mainstream media and cultural elites to perpetuate a panic about the weather and climate.”
The snow mass graph from Environment Canada includes mountainous areas so shouldn’t be directly compared with the FMI graph, but they should track each other reasonably closely. However since it shows that for the past few months snow mass was above average but not as much above average as the old FMI data I’m not sure which version of the FMI is more accurate. It could be the case that they realised the old version was showing too much snow, tried to make a valid correction and got it wrong so the new version shows too little snow.
I couldn’t find archived charts on their website to see if they’ve revised previous years downwards. It’s a case of waiting until next year and seeing what they show. If they show snow mass above average this makes it more likely that their correction was justified rather than agenda driven data tampering.
The AGW narrative is failing…miserably. It is now OK to openly mock those that still push such insane and unfounded ideas. There is NO reason for anyone to believe the lies that are constantly being spewed out of the talking heads mouths. We are winning in the court of public opinion.
The Windy.com snow depth map shows a foot of snow here at sea level but there is no snow. The map shows 34 inches at 4000ft but there’s only an inch. Who knows if the NH Snow Mass chart is right or wrong, no way to check it.
Great sunset today:
https://storage.roundshot.com/5d8367d3a33008.07256823/2025-04-14/20-00-00/2025-04-14-20-00-00_default.jpg
Cyclone forming now from volcanos headed for NZ forecast a foot of rain next two weeks. Solar flares active, surf’s up NZ. 😎