Prof. Nils-Axel Mörner: “The Approaching Grand Solar Minimum and Little Ice Age Conditions”
[A recap article today due to family reasons. This was originally published on electroverse.net on Sept 6, 2020.]
Nils-Axel Mörner is the former head of the paleogeophysics and geodynamics department at Stockholm University. He retired in 2005 and since has dedicated his days to disproving the IPPC’s thermageddon nonsense while also warning of a coming Grand Solar Minimum.
Between 1997-2003, Mörner chaired an INTAS project on Geomagnetism & Climate — a project concluding that by the middle of the 21st century the Sun would be in a new solar minimum and Little Ice Age climatic conditions would prevail on Earth.
These conclusions were quite straightforward, writes Mörner, and were included in a Special Issue of PRP:
“Obviously we are on our way into a new grand solar minimum. This sheds serious doubts on the issue of a continued, even accelerated, warming as proposed by the IPCC project.”
This quite innocent, logically and honest account made the publisher take the remarkable step of closing down the entire scientific journal. This censorship gave rise to turbulence and objections within the scientific community, but it didn’t stop Mörner, who kept publishing scientific works regarding the impending GSM.
In 2015, Mörner’s “The Approaching New Grand Solar Minimum and Little Ice Age Climate Conditions” was published. The paper suggests that by 2030-2040 the Sun will experience a new grand solar minimum.
This is evident from multiple studies of quite different characteristics, writes Mörner:
“The phasing of sunspot cycles, the cyclic observations of North Atlantic behavior over the past millennium, the cyclic pattern of cosmogenic radionuclides in natural terrestrial archives, the motions of the Sun with respect to the center of mass, the planetary spin-orbit coupling, the planetary conjunction history, and the general planetary-solar-terrestrial interaction.”
During the previous grand solar minima—i.e. the Spörer Mini-mum (ca 1440-1460), the Maunder Minimum (ca 1687-1703) and the Dalton Minimum (ca 1809- 1821)—the climatic conditions deteriorated into Little Ice Age periods.
Salvador presented a mathematical model of the sunspot cycles based on Wilson’s tidal-torque model–above.
Salvador’s model had an 85% correlation with the sunspot numbers observed for 1749-2013, and made “a reasonable representation of the sunspot cycles for the past 1000 yr.”
Therefore, it justified an extrapolation for the next century:
The prediction gives an extended low up to 2160 with the lowest values reached within the period 2028-2042; i.e. just where we expect the New Grand Solar Minimum to occur.
In 2015, Salvador extended his analysis over the last 4000 years, comparing his model with the observed 10Be variations:
The phasing of the solar cycles gives a clear message for the middle of the century: there will be a New Grand Solar Minimum. The same message is seen when we consider the cyclic relations between Earth’s rotation, ocean circulation, and Arctic climate, too.
During the last three grand solar minima—the Spörer, Maunder and Dalton Minima—global climate experienced Little Ice Age conditions. Arctic water penetrated to the south all the way down to Mid Portugal, and Europe experienced severe climatic conditions. The Arctic ice cover expanded significantly.
“We now seem to be in possession of quite convergent data indicating that we, by 2030-2040, will be in a New Grand Solar Minimum which, by analogy to past minima, must be assumed will lead to a significant climatic deterioration with ice expansion in the Arctic.”
The mathematical model by Salvador seems to provide an excellent tool for the prediction of future sunspot variations.
All this precludes a continual warming as claimed by the IPCC. Instead of this, concludes Mörner, we are likely to face a new Little Ice Age.
NOAA seems to agree with their forecast starting to drop in 2025 and continuing to drop to zero in 2040 when their forecast ends,
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/predicted-sunspot-number-and-radio-flux
Here is the website of Prof. Zarakova who also predicted a Grand Solar Miniumum.
https://solargsm.com/
Cap:
In reading the full article by Morner and looking at Figure 6 with the model forecast, his model is not holding up for the most recent years. In the model we would be seeing a sunspot max of about 35-40 in about 2023, and instead we are seeing in the lower 100’s. The cycle min. appears to have occurred about 2 years later than 2018, instead in 2020. Does that mean the model is flawed, or that the timing is off, or is there some other explanation.
I appreciate all of your work. We enjoyed your children’s book.
Thanks,
Jimmy Griffith
Love this Nobel prize winner exposing the techno con job pseudo science lie of climate change.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8-WoobS7jtw
I too enjoy Electroverse online. This Morner paper is interesting and the https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8-WoobS7jtw link is good. I took notes.
Thank you!
Peter Forster.
In Accuweather they are predicting a mild winter with less snow than normal and temperatures above average for the USA. No brutal winter in the forecast.
The Old Farmer’s Almanac is predicting a colder winter. They have a much better track record than the NOAA or IPCC.
Accuweather? Lets just see. LAST winter we had huge snowfall, in case you, Mr.unknown had not read what happened at all ski resorts. ALSO, IF you can read, understand, and do some good research, SNOW IS FALLING RIGHT NOW IN MANY PLACES, AND IT LOOKS LIKE THEY…MAMMOTH, all those Sierra Nevada, will be buried again. Accuweather MUST continue the narrative. Please do not live with cognitive dissonance.
Snow last year and now from solar activity and volcanos which are forecast to get stronger for the next year. Solar activity NOW quakes volcanos cyclones snow NOW planetary alignments NOW on schedule:
https://www.spaceweather.com/images2023/26oct23/fastmover.gif
https://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/data/LATEST/current_c2.gif
https://www.solarham.net/pictures/2023/oct27_2023_cme.png
https://gong.nso.edu/data/magmap/QR/bqG/202310/mrbqG231027/mrbqG231027t0904c2277_312.gif
https://www.spaceweather.com/images2023/27oct23/coronalhole_sdo_blank.jpg
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000l6k4/executive
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?tcso2,55.379,173.760,5,i:pressure,m:fcsakE2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-mdBo6sUR4
https://www.mtbachelor.com/the-mountain/webcams/mountain
https://www.timberlinelodge.com/conditions
https://www.jacksonhole.com/live-mountain-cams
Dirk-
Thanks for the cam links again. I always forget about them after awhile. I was just watching the sun come up from Cloudchaser lift on Mt. Batchelor. I never get to see sunrise here in the woods.
-Deb
It’s Sunday 5AM posted that comment Thursday didn’t register on ‘ere till Friday. The SO2 reading I marked on Kamchatka is still active four days later going strong the whole time. SO2 plume from there bringing another storm NW US Wed 10/1.
Big quake Vanuatu yesterday with solar activity increased volcano going strong producing a cyclone N of NZ. Solar wind speed 675kps yesterday: Same pattern as last few years.
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/content/space-weather-enthusiasts-dashboard
https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us7000l7b6/executive
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?tcso2,-35.246,173.496,4,i:pressure,m:c8DakSt
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?gust,-28.691,177.144,5,i:pressure,m:cGuak2I
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?rain,-28.691,177.144,5,i:pressure,m:cGuak2I
Blizz live cam: https://tellurideskiresort.com/webcams/see-forever-webcam/
I’m not sure what Accuweather predicted for previous winters in the US and how accurate their forecasts are, but they’re a commercial company that make money by selling forecasts to other companies so I guess they have a reasonable degree of success otherwise companies would stop using them. I don’t know if they’ve bought into the AGW rubbish, but quite a few meteorologists are climate sceptics as they know far more about how the atmosphere works than the IPCC modellers and know that extreme weather events have a natural explanation that doesn’t involve CO2. They’ve made a prediction that may be different from a few others, but in science the minority position sometimes turns out to be the correct one. The good thing about a prediction for the next 6 months rather than vague AGW predictions for what may happen in several decades is we don’t have to wait long to see if it ends up being correct. If relatively low solar activity is leading to a wavy jet stream then large parts of the US may spend a lot of the winter under one of the wave peaks and experience warm air pushing up from the south. Time will tell, and I’m not convinced an early possibly record breaking Arctic plunge tells us anything about what the rest of the Autumn/Winter is going to be like. If Accuweather get it right this time it doesn’t mean much and I certainly won’t start believing in catastrophic AGW.
I’m still waiting for the Dire Predictions of Doom from the 1990’s to come true. It’s well into the 2020’s now and as far as I can tell, the arctic still has sea ice, Greenland hasn’t melted yet, my home hasn’t become a shorefront property due to rising sea levels and it seems neither hotter, colder or stormier than when I was a boy.
Hmmm, even St Greta’s world ending in 5 years failed to materialise, at least, in my part of the world. Seems the polar bears are doing fine too.
Seems to me, the only prediction of the last 80 years I recall that came true was the computer industry predicting that one day, computers will weigh as little as 3 tons.
There isn’t going to be a grand solar minimum,neither will there be runaway warming.But you do you.
First, a few years since we don’t even have see the hottest day on Earth, as proclaimed by warmists.
Second, we now have more days with ‘absence’ of heat and more ‘signs’ of cold and they are more frequent signs of cold and snow.
You can’t sit on the fence any longer.
There’s been more than enough evidence and quality science available for decades to confidently dismiss the IPCC position. However if solar cycle 25 turns out to be a lot stronger than predicted it would be logical to then question how reliable the predictions for cycles 26 and 27 are. Also due to the amount of heat stored in the oceans there may be a delay of years or even more than a decade between low solar activity and lower global temperature anomalies. Also on a time scale of a few decades ocean cycles such as the PDO may well have a larger effect on global temps than solar activity. It’s currently in it’s negative i.e. cool phase, but if it switches to it’s positive phase in the late 2030’s or early 2040’s it may counteract some of the solar cooling that may occur. The Maunder, Dalton etc. minimums led to a noticeable drop in temperature as measured by various proxies, but temperatures prior to the minimum were lower than current global averages.
I certainly don’t believe in AGW, a climate crisis or whatever term some people use, but on the question of whether or not anyone alive today is going to see LIA type conditions I’m prepared to sit on the fence for at least another 10 years until we how cycle 26 is playing out and what the 20-30 year temperature trend is.
The Grand Solar Minimum has already started, but the Sun is also in a Solar Maximum period. NOAA forecasts that the Sunspot Number will start dropping in 2025 and will continue to drop until it hits zero in 2040 when their forecast ends. The cooler sunspots are associated with hotter areas that increase solar output and fewer sunspots will reflect a lower solar output along with a lower magnetic field allowing more galactic cosmic rays to increase cloud cover leading to cooling.
https://www.swpc.noaa.gov/products/predicted-sunspot-number-and-radio-flux
Here is a site that provides a chart of the Sunspot Number for the past month.
https://www.met.gov.my/en/pencerapan/cuaca-angkasa/
http://wso.stanford.edu/gifs/Polar.gif
http://wso.stanford.edu/gifs/north.gif
http://wso.stanford.edu/gifs/south.gif