Move Over Polar Bears, “Baby Penguins Are Dying”
Doing the rounds this week is the story that Emperor penguins are facing “an unprecedented breeding failure due to ice loss in 2022, a study says”. The research goes on to claim that 90% of them will be “quasi-extinct” by the end of the century.
‘Quasi-extinction’ arises when the density of reproductive individuals in a given population becomes so small that it’s unable to sustain a growing or even stable population.
Move over polar bears, “baby penguins are dying”, so reports bloomberg.com.
The new study, published Thursday by researchers from the British Antarctic Survey, backs predictions that Emperor penguins “will be quasi-extinct” by the end of the century under the current global warming trajectory.
With the planet already 1.2C warmer since pre-industrial times, continues Bloomberg, scientists have become increasingly alarmed by how the Antarctic ice has struggled to grow back after hitting a record low in February, what they claim is a “six sigma event,” or once-in-a-7.5-million-year phenomenon.
This is an absurd claim, and the data clearly state otherwise, but forwarding The Narrative is held above the science of reasoning.
There has been a concerted effort to push the ‘global boiling’ rhetoric harder than ever this year.
Cherry-picked exaggerations of wildfires, ‘heat domes’ and ice loss have, for now, resigned COVID-scares to the back seat; our thoughts and fears have been returned to the mother of all scares: The End Of The World.
Now, this is a low year for Antarctic sea ice, nobody is denying that, but the multidecadal trend of growth will not be altered (see chart below). Legacy media outlets usually steer clear of Antarctica due to this trend, as the data don’t support their narrative. To watch them collectively pounce on events this year without even a nod to the ‘inconvenient’ growth of decades past says it all:
I want only adults in the room now, adults that can recall the decades of comparable polar bear scare stories:
And re. Emperor penguins, The Guardian was fear-mongering long-before it was fashionable, back in 2014 (ironically during what turned out to be a record-high year for Antarctic sea ice extent):
Since 2014 though, the penguin population has increased.
The Pointe Géologie chart below, which uses the extreme RCP 8.5 climate scenario of a high-emissions future to tell its fairy-tale, foretells of a stark decline in the number of penguins–which was supposed to commence in 2018.
Note: charts on penguin populations are hard to come by, which itself is probably telling.
I hope even the alarmists have learnt their lesson.
‘The Science Says’ is a browbeating tool not an accurate predictor of future events.
Mainstream focus has turned to those cute, fluffy, vulnerable little baby penguins at the bottom of the world because biodiversity at the top of the world, across Greenland and the Arctic, is now thriving.
Fanciful AGW Party tellings of polar bear decline have been shown to be nothing but agenda-driving drivel.
Numbers of polar bears have increased since the 1960s, the data don’t lie, and the thousands of proclamations calling for their extinction, which remember were all backed by ‘peer-reviewed science’ and ‘expert testimony’, have been proven dead wrong.
However, discussing past AGW failures is considered heresy, it isn’t permitted. But without an accurate critique of history we are doomed to repeat it — and here we go again, different pole, same story:
Amusingly, many of the very same ‘experts’ calling for the extinction of the polar bears have now switched their racket to decrying the baby penguin population. These ‘pundits’ feel protected by the establishment, is all I can assume; warmed by the encouragement offered by the AGW community; by the sense of safety in numbers: “the polar bears population is increasing,” they must privately concede, “perhaps there’s a variable we didn’t consider–BUT HOLY SHIT, LOOK AT THE BABY PENGUINS!!!”
And here’s the crux, the dangled carrot:
“Meeting the Paris goal could save the penguins,” states The Conversation. “The results of the new study showed that if the world meets the Paris climate agreement targets [we] could protect sufficient habitat to halt the emperor penguins’ decline.”
The Guardian end on a similarly instructional note–with the help of Dr Peter Fretwell, lead author of the study.
“It’s only by changing our behavior and the amounts of fossil fuels we use will we reverse the trajectory for these emperor penguins, and many other species,” said Fretwell. “How bad it gets is still up to us,” he concluded, dutifully hitting all of the correct AGW Party notes: ‘The end of the world can still be avoided so long as you give up cheap and reliable energy, accept lower living standards, have fewer children, stop eating meat, and pay us an exorbitant carbon tax — all will be great if YOU stop prospering’.
To Conclude
I think it’s a safe bet that said sea dwelling birds are resilient enough to deal with one season of anomalously-low sea ice extent. The first discovered fossils of emperor penguins date back 60 million years. They’ve dealt with much worse. They’ll be fine.
Hi Cap – great reporting, thank you!
I have recently had a few articles published in a “mainstream-ish” outlet. There are plenty of mainstream sceptics, but they are unwilling to touch the “CO2 is poison” religion, so I was pleased that they published this:
https://reaction.life/the-religion-of-climate-alarmism/
And two previous articles in the series:
https://reaction.life/the-heat-is-getting-to-everyones-head/
https://reaction.life/has-the-mainstream-press-lost-all-desire-to-investigate-climate-alarmist-claims/ (which addresses some of the Antarctic scaremongering that you discuss above).
https://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-background-articles/the-pacific-decadal-oscillation/
and some are bringing back masks, against the dreaded cough cough disease, which had a survival rate of 99.78%……
Covid-19 attacked my thyroid gland and caused my blood pressure to shoot up with the capillaries in the middle of my retina releasing fluid causing my retina to separate. Now I’m blind in one eye, and that was my better eye. If that wasn’t bad enough the lack of thyroid hormone caused extreme forgetfulness. I often couldn’t even remember what I was thinking. I even forgot how to use a my debit card card with a pin machine. It was awful but at least it didn’t kill me. It took about 8 months to recover.
On Windy.com you can see there’s plenty of sea ice down under on the waves category where there’s no waves that’s ice. You can see it’s snowing down there and it’s below zero F. SST anoms map shows ice down there too:
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?waves,-65.477,-35.596,3,i:pressure
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?snowAccu,next10d,-65.477,-35.596,3,i:pressure,m:QHaejg
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?
temp,-65.477,-35.596,3,i:pressure,m:QHaejg
https://www.ospo.noaa.gov/data/cb/ssta/ssta.daily.current.png
Looks normal, cold.
Hey Cap. There’s a tropical depression/ storm coming in the gulf next week. Once it passes we’re predicted to get into the 60’s F at night. Highly unusual since that first cool front ( finally a break in the heat) is a month & a half early. Im in inland central Florida
My part of Texas is expecting 110 degrees Fahrenheit on Sunday. We’ve only had 1 day below 100 degrees Fahrenheit since the last week of July. I’ll take a late August Cold Front if it will shift us back to our typical 95 degrees for this time of year.
And rain. We have had no measurable rain since early July. A nice strong El Niño winter with cooler and wetter weather will be welcome.
rain…Rain…RAIN???
That’s all we’ve had here in KY!!!
And if ya want mud we got MUD!!!
And we have gotten to 90°F twice this Summer where we usually have two to Three WEEKS of 90’s.
Trust me…our garden sucks cuz low Solar and rain rain rain….
Electrons lower, volcanos quieter:
http://www.solen.info/solar/images/electronfluence.png
https://www.windy.com/-Show—add-more-layers/overlays?tcso2,25.245,-134.033,3,i:pressure,m:d7bac1n
The whole story is propaganda BS.
Emperor Penguins travel 50 miles or more from the ocean to establish a breeding colony – clearly these “journalists” reporting this nonsense believe gobbledygook like that idiotic Canadian reporter who reported a Polar Bear attacked the underwater viewing window because a child had a plus toy penguin and the sight of the bear’s nemesis enraged it without even having the intelligence to realise penguins and polar bears never meet in the wild – what an idiot she was and how stupid the alarmists who supported her “journalism”
Anyway from https://www.twinkl.com.au/homework-help/geography-homework-help/antartica/emperor-penguins-facts-for-kids
“Each winter (which starts in March in Antarctica), penguins travel up to 50 miles to reach safe breeding grounds. Males arrive first, looking to attract a mate with displays and courtship calls. Emperor penguins are monogamous, which means they only have one mate per breeding season. Many find new mates the following year, although some pairs reconnect.”
This is a well known fact that amazes scientists – penguins breed in the most remote cold places in Antarctica and the males survive great hardships while the females travel to feed !
Another piece of propaganda BS.
I was speaking to a friend the other day about how renewables had doubled our energy bills and she responded that it was better than wildfires drought etc etc.
I am always amazed that people can be so stupid to think that the tiny amount of CO2 in the atmosphere apparently heats the atmosphere so much that spontaneous combustion occurs – these people are really stupid and the best reason why democracies worldwide are failing.
You’ve basically summed it up perfectly. Emperor penguins need sea ice in the winter so no amount of warming (even if it were to occour) is going to leave them without a platform to breed on even in the unlikely event that the Antarctic becomes sea ice free in summer. Similarly polar bears need ice in winter and especially when seals give birth in spring so are never going to be without a platform to hunt from. They can gain enough weight in a few months to be able to go for months through the summer eating very little. I wonder if the “scientists” writing their extinction BS and the journalists repeating it are aware of these basic facts, or do they just hope a lot of the public don’t know the basic facts.
Tell those ‘people’ to go outside and look at the Sun. Now ask them what would happen if we blocked the Sun out completely??? “Uh…uh I don’t knooowww!”
The Sun is what controls Earths temps not Man/CO2 or my gas/oil burning truck…
The data on the penguin colony at Pointe Geologie has an interesting story attached to it. There was a major decrease in population over the course of a few years in the late 1970’s. This was when the French government built a new airstrip to service their research station. It appears that the noise from the construction work which included using loads of explosives to level and join up a couple of offshore islets caused a lot of the birds to abandon the breeding colony and, hopefully, breed somewhere else. Once the disturbance ended there has been a slow increase in numbers. The penguin numbers at Pointe Geologie were first used by Dr Ainley to promote a global warming scare on his website some time prior to 2013, I wonder why it’s taken so long for this story to resurface.
Information taken from Landscapes and Cycles by Jim Steele. IMO one of the best climate realist books there is.
“Hockey stick science” – it’s an art form!
1) There has to be a graph with normal-normal-normal-OMFG WE’RE FUCKED. The OMG part at the end is complete pie in the sky. It’s made up. Nope, make it a bit steeper. Really dramatic. That’s it Steve, you got it! It’s fear we’re after here!
2) AND LOOK AT THE BABY PENGUIN!!!!! If you don’t like baby penguins you’re a vewwy vewwy bad person!!!! Bad bad bad!!!! Anyone who objects to our faux science is immediately categorized as a penguin-hating, gas-guzzling psychopath!
3) Will we get caught? Don’t even worry about it Steve! People will finally suspect that it was made up 10 years later – but by then it will have done its job and the people at whom the finger should be pointed will have receded into the background.
4) A dude looking very scientific, ideally with glasses with ice-cube thick lenses explaining said graph. Gotta have one of those.
3) The politicians? Don’t worry about them. You think the Borises of the world have ever read scientific papers? They’ll buy it hook line and sinker.
Mr Bloomberg needs to increase his billions (because he’s still NOT happy) by having his investments in solar panels and wind mills increase. His minions must keep the propaganda going.